The fine print

Nobody (well, almost nobody) reads the fine print. Whether it’s warranty information or a software app’s end user license agreement, those pages and pages of legalese largely go overlooked.

This reality isn’t lost on radio commercial producers. Sometimes a radio spot must include a disclaimer — usually for a bank or credit card company or an automobile leasing service. Anything, really, involving credit. But those disclaimers can take up many precious seconds of air time. Who wants to waste twenty seconds of a sixty-second spot on legal mumbo-jumbo? Not your average ad agency!

So let’s call in the geek squad … those Melvins with the thick glasses who know how to use digital thingamajigs to do magic tricks with audio. First they record the talent reading the disclaimer, preferably in a monotone. Then they import the audio into the computer and cut out all the breaths and pauses.

Finally — and here’s the magic — the audio is run through a time compression algorithm which speeds it up without altering the pitch. Kind of like the Chipmunks, but digital.

Here’s an original disclaimer from a recent Capital One ad on 1010 WINS:

disclaimer

Say what? Something about FDIC? This goes by in a breezy thirteen seconds and is fairly incomprehensible.

But suppose you, too, had access to some digital audio tools. You might be able to record this commercial and slow it down — by a factor of 65.6%. If so, this is what the disclaimer would sound like (with pauses and breaths still omitted), stretched out to twenty seconds:

disclaimer slow

So would you go for this offer if you knew everything could change after the first year? Or if you had to maintain a $5000 monthly balance? Well, that’s up to you, but the question is — how would you know?

The problem I have with the sped-up-disclaimer production technique — and it’s all over commercial radio — is that it’s not possible to understand the disclaimer. A print disclaimer you can read — if you want to. It’s there, it’s readable. But time-compressed audio is not understandable. It’s like trying to make sense of a livestock auctioneer. No way you can follow it, even if you’re hopped up on Red Bull and amphetamines.

So is this a fair production technique — or is it so far off the dial it’s reprehensible? Let me know in the comments.

Share

About Lars

Lars Hoel is an audio professional with over 35 years of both analog and digital experience in recording, post-production, live broadcast, theater, and audio installations. Hoel produced his first story for National Public Radio in 1972, soon after NPR went on the air. It was a story about skydiving and it ran on "All Things Considered." Hoel later worked for so many public and commercial radio stations even he’s lost count. He joined the NPR staff in the early 1980s and continued there in various capacities for the next ten years. Most notably, he served as "Morning Edition" executive producer and "Weekend Edition Sunday" producer.
This entry was posted in How Not To, On The Air, Philosophy. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The fine print

  1. Rich says:

    I hate it, too. It’s meant to be consumer protection, yet — to your point — it’s a waste of time because it can’t be understood. But what are you gonna do if the lawyers, FTC, etc. demand it? Reallocate your budget for that disclaimer-heavy spot to print, TV or the web instead? That further chips away at shaky commercial radio.

  2. Pingback: Worst disclaimer ever | Radio Off The Dial (2012)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>